OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget
ACTION: Final revision of OMB Circular A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations"
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revises OMB Circular A-122 by
amending the definition for equipment; requiring the breakout of indirect costs into two categories
(facilities and administration) for certain non-profit organizations; modifying the multiple
allocation basis; and, clarifying the treatment of certain cost items.
DATES: The revision is effective on June 1, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal agencies should contact Gilbert Tran,
Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-3993.
Non-Federal organizations should contact the organization's Federal cognizant agency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On October 6, 1995, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a final revision to
OMB Circular A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations," in the Federal Register (60
FR 52516) regarding interest allowability. The revision was made in a continuing effort to
increase consistency across OMB's cost principles circulars A-122, A-21, "Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions," and A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal
Governments." To further the goals of consistency, OMB proposed on the same date (60 FR
52522) to revise the definition of equipment, to clarify the treatment of certain types of costs, to
modify the multiple allocation base method for computing indirect cost rate(s), and to place an
upper-limit on payments of administrative expenses for certain non-profit organizations.
With this final revision, Circular A-122 consists of the Circular as issued in 1980 (45 FR 46022;
July 8, 1980), as amended in 1984 (49 FR 18260; April 27, 1984), in 1987 (52 FR 19788; May
27, 1987), in 1995 (60 FR 52516; October 6, 1995), in 1997 (62 FR 45934; August 29, 1997),
and in this notice. A recompilation of the entire Circular A-122, with all its amendments,
accompanies the notice and is available in electronic form on the OMB Home Page at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB.
B. Current Revisions
Circular A-122 is revised in this notice to:
1. Amend the definition of equipment by increasing the capitalization threshold to the lesser
amount used for financial statement purposes or $5,000 (see paragraph 15).
2. Require major non-profit organizations (those receiving more than $10 million in direct Federal funding) to report indirect cost rates by two major component categories: facilities and administration (see paragraph D, Attachment A).
3. Modify the multiple allocation base method (MAB) to be consistent with OMB Circular A-21
(see paragraph D.3). However, major non-profit organizations are not required to use the
multiple allocation base method. MAB remains one of the three available methodologies for
computing indirect costs.
4. Clarify the treatment of the following cost items to provide consistency across OMB's cost
principles circulars (A-21 and A-87) and the Federal Acquisition Regulations, where applicable:
OMB is not implementing the proposed restrictions on trustees' travel expenses at non-profit organizations. In line with this decision, and to further consistency between cost circulars, OMB will be amending Circular A-21 to allow trustees' travel expenses.
OMB defers considering an upper-limit on payment of administrative expenses until better data on
indirect costs at non-profit organizations are collected.
C. Comments and Responses
OMB received about 185 comments from non-profit organizations, Federal agencies, professional
organizations and accounting firms. A summary of comments and OMB's responses are included
in this notice. Several comments resulted in modifications to OMB's original proposal.
The comments and OMB's responses are summarized by section as follow.
Equipment Definition
Comment: Clarification is needed on the treatment of depreciation of those assets which had
costs between the old $500 threshold and the new $5,000.
Response: In order to clarify the accounting for the undepreciated portion of any equipment costs
as a result of a change in capitalization levels, paragraph 15 has been added to explain that the
undepreciated amount may be recovered by continuing to claim otherwise allowable use
allowances or depreciation on the equipment, or by amortizing the amount to be written off over a
period of years as negotiated with the Federal cognizant agency.
Comment: Clarification is needed on whether equipment under the $5,000 threshold, as
established by the non-profit organizations' policy, requires Federal approval prior to acquisition.
Response: Equipment under the $5,000 threshold, as established by the non-profit organization's
policy, can be directly charged to sponsored agreements (subparagraph 15.b) without prior
Federal approval.
Comment: Current subparagraph 13.b requires prior approval for special purpose equipment, as
direct costs, with a unit cost of $1,000 or more. This requirement is not consistent with the
higher threshold of $5,000 allowed in the proposed revision. This requirement should be revised
to be consistent with the proposed revision.
Response: OMB agrees. The Circular is revised to require prior Federal approval only for special
purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more.
Unallowable Cost Items
These ten revised cost items are already unallowable under OMB Circulars A-21, "Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions," and A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal
Governments," and/or the Federal Acquisition Regulations. OMB addressed the issue of trustees'
travel in response to the comments received. For the other items, consistency across Federal cost
regulations was a more significant issue than most of the commenters' concerns. Comments
related to specific cost items are presented below, followed by OMB's responses.
Advertising and Public Relations Costs
Comment: Current paragraph 37, Public information service costs, should be combined with the
"Advertising" paragraph to be consistent with other OMB cost principles in Circulars A-21 and
A-87.
Response: The commenter is correct. The treatment of public information service costs is now
addressed in revised paragraph 1, Advertising and public relations costs. Current paragraph 37 is
deleted.
Comment: Clarify the types of activities that are allowable as public relations costs. Public
relations costs to carry out certain functions, such as legitimate program outreach, that are
required under sponsored programs and contracts should be allowable.
Response: The Circular is revised to clarify that certain public relations costs for the purpose of
communicating specific activities related to the sponsored programs to the public or the press are
allowable costs. When they are necessary for program outreach effort as required by sponsored
programs, public relations costs are allowable. Costs of advertising and public relations incurred
solely to promote the organization are unallowable.
Comment: Clarify whether advertising media costs such as radio and television are allowable.
Response: As long as the public relations costs are specifically required by the sponsored
programs or are related to the promotion of sponsored programs, any reasonable advertising
media, including magazines, newspapers, radio, television, direct mail, exhibits, and the like, can
be used and its costs are allowable. See paragraph 1.a.
Comment: Community relation costs should be allowable as part of program outreach effort for
Federal sponsored programs.
Response: Community relations are defined in subparagraph 1.b as "those activities dedicated to
maintain the image of the organization or promoting understanding and favorable relations with
the community or public at large or any segment of the public." Costs related to community
relations are allowable when the costs are required or necessary to the performance of the
sponsored programs.
Organization-furnished automobiles for personal use
Comment: For security and economic reasons, non-profit organizations often furnish automobiles
and housing for its personnel working on Federal projects (e.g., overseas projects sponsored by
the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. State Department). These costs
should be allowable as direct costs.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow these costs when they are necessary to perform the
Federal projects, particularly the overseas sponsored projects with prior approval by the Federal
awarding agency. These costs are allowable only as direct costs to the Federal projects, and not
as fringe benefit or indirect costs.
Comment: The Circular should specify which types of automobiles are allowable or unallowable
(e.g., cars, vans, trucks and buses).
Response: The types of automobiles are irrelevant for the purpose of determining the allowability
of automobile costs. Rather, the determinant factors should be whether the automobile costs are
reasonable and necessary for the performance of the Federal projects and authorized by the
Federal awarding agency.
Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent
infringements
Comment: Current paragraph 35.d, Professional service costs, should be combined with new
paragraph 10.
Response: OMB agrees. Current paragraph 35.d is deleted. Professional service costs related to
defense of antitrust suits, prosecution of claims against the Federal Government and patent
infringement litigation are discussed in new paragraph 10. Professional service costs incurred for
organization and reorganization are discussed in paragraph 31, Organization costs.
Comment: Clarification is needed as to when legal costs related to claims, appeals or proceeding
become unallowable. Commenters noted that Federal agencies are inconsistent in the
determination of the allowability of legal costs as one agency would allow legal costs up to the
point where the case goes out of the Federal agency appeal process and to the courts, whereas
other agencies would only allow legal costs through the first phase of appeals within the Federal
agency.
Response: The policy makes unallowable legal and related costs for either defending against
claims made by the Federal Government or prosecuting claims against the Government. As such,
once a final management decision letter is issued by the agency (for example, a disallowance
letter), all legal and related costs are unallowable from that point forward. Unallowable costs
would include claims and defenses pursued through agencies' formal appeal procedures such as
administrative law judges and agency appeal boards. Note that legal and related costs may be
allowable if the non-profit organization's position is sustained by the administrative appeal process
or an agreement is reached between the organization and the Federal Government (see
subparagraghs 10.b, 10.c, 10.d and 10.e). This revision is consistent with the language contained
in OMB Circular A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions."
Comment: Some commenters objected to the proposed 80 percent limitation on reimbursement
when the institution is found innocent.
Response: The proposed revision was retained because it provides consistency with procurement
contracts. This limitation is based on the statutory language of Public Law 100-700, Major Fraud
Act of 1988, November 19, 1988 (41 U.S.C., 256 (k)(5)), which only allows recovery of 80
percent of the legal costs.
Comment: Legal expenses to defend against lawsuits brought by a foreign government for
violation of that country's law should be allowable.
Response: The Circular is revised in subparagraph 10.d to authorize Federal agencies to allow
legal expenses to defend against lawsuits brought by a foreign government for violation of its law
when such costs were necessary or were direct results of the performance of Federal sponsored
programs. The same authorizations apply for legal costs for defense against lawsuits brought by
state or local governments.
Comment: Legal fees to defend against lawsuits filed by former employees for termination or by
subrecipients should be allowable.
Response: Legal fees incurred in defense of lawsuits not brought by a Federal, State, local or
foreign government, except when the suits are brought by former employees under Section 2 of
the Major Fraud Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-700), are allowable.
Housing and living expenses
Comment: For security and economic reasons, non-profit organizations often furnish automobiles
and housing for its personnel working on overseas Federal projects (e.g., overseas projects
sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development). These costs should be allowable
as direct costs.
Response: As previously noted (in the discussion of automobiles), the Circular is revised to allow
these costs when they are necessary to perform the Federal projects and when they are approved
by the Federal awarding agency. These costs are allowable only as direct costs to the Federal
projects, and not as fringe benefit or indirect costs.
Insurance
Comment: General and casualty liability insurance costs for organization's directors and
administrators should be allowable.
Response: General and casualty liability insurance costs for organization's directors and
administrators are allowable, subject to limitations, as described in subparagraph 22.a.(2). New
subparagraph 22.a.(2).f, Insurance against defects, prohibits the reimbursement of costs against
Federally sponsored awards for product (or services) liability insurance costs.
Comment: Medical liability insurance costs for participants in Federal training programs should
be allowable.
Response: Medical liability insurance costs associated with participants in Federal training
programs are allowable to Federal programs as direct costs.
Comment: Malpractice insurance costs for physicians should be direct charged to Federal
programs while malpractice insurance costs for nurses or laboratory assistants, which are
immaterial in most cases, should be charged as indirect costs.
Response: Subparagraph B.2 of Attachment A provides that when a direct cost is of minor
amounts, it may be treated as an indirect cost for reasons of practicality and efficiency, provided
that the accounting treatment for such cost is consistently applied to all final cost objectives.
Therefore, when malpractice insurance costs for nurses or lab technicians are immaterial in
relation to its effect on the overall indirect cost rates of the organization, they may be treated as
indirect costs.
Memberships
Comment: Membership costs in civic and community organizations should be allowable.
Response: Membership costs are allowable for business and professional organizations. The
Circular is further revised to allow membership costs in civic and community organizations when
associations with these organizations are essential to the performance of the Federal programs (as
an outreach function). These membership costs must be approved by the Federal cognizant
agency.
Comment: Costs of membership in organizations that lobby should be unallowable.
Response: Paragraph 25 of the Circular disallows lobbying costs. Membership dues to lobbying
organizations are therefore unallowable. The unallowable portion of membership dues is
determined by the percentage of lobbying activities versus other allowable activities of the
lobbying organization.
Selling or Marketing of Goods and Services
Comment: Clarification is needed for what types of activities are considered to be the selling or
marketing of goods and services.
Response: Selling or marketing of goods and services generally include an organization's efforts
to market the organization's products or services such as through advertising, organizational
image enhancement, market planning and direct selling. Direct selling efforts are those acts or
actions used to induce particular customers to purchase particular products or services of the
organization. The allowability provisions for advertising costs are described in paragraph 1.
Comment: The guidelines for selling or marketing of goods and services should be consistent
with those in FAR 31.205.38(c)(1).
Response: FAR 31.205.38(c)(1) allows direct selling costs at commercial contractors if they are
reasonable in amount. By contrast to the commercial contract context, direct selling costs are
generally not considered to be necessary costs for the performance of Federal sponsored
programs by non-profit organizations. In those cases where they are essential for certain Federal
sponsored programs, these costs can be charged as direct costs to the Federal sponsored
programs if they are approved by the Federal awarding agency.
Comment: Given that the Bayh-Dole Act encouraged technology transfer, selling or marketing
costs of goods or services should be allowable costs. At the minimum, these costs should be
allowable as direct costs to the Federal projects.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow selling or marketing costs as direct costs to some
Federal sponsored programs when approved by the Federal awarding agency.
Severance Pay
Comment: Early retirement benefits should be allowable costs.
Response: Early retirement benefit costs are allowable costs, subject to limitations, and are
discussed in subparagraph 6.f, Fringe Benefits, along with other forms of fringe benefits.
Paragraph 49, Severance Pay, deals only with severance policy, i.e., dismissal, and the
reimbursement of its costs.
Comment: Guidelines for costs of severance pay to foreign nationals in excess of customary or
prevailing practices should be consistent with section 2151 of the Federal Acquisition
Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA).
Response: OMB agrees. The Circular is revised to be consistent with FASA guidelines for
severance pay to foreign nationals in excess of customary or prevailing practices. As a result, the
Federal awarding agency may allow these costs when they are necessary for the performance of
the Federal sponsored programs.
Trustees' Travel
Comment: Several commenters opposed the proposal to disallow trustees' travel costs citing the
difficulty of retaining or obtaining members to serve voluntarily on the Board of Trustees (or
Directors) of a non-profit organization, if Board members have to pay for their own travel
expenses to attend Board meetings. The commenters added that since serving on a non-profit
organization's Board is often not as prestigious and desirable as serving on a University's Board
(where trustees' travel costs are unallowable under Circular A-21), non-reimbursement of the
travel costs would inhibit the recruitment of Board members.
Response: OMB concurs that disallowing the reimbursement of trustees' travel costs could inhibit
the recruitment of qualified Board members (particularly at smaller non-profit organizations),
thereby hampering the operations of a non-profit organization. OMB also recognizes that
trustees' travel costs are reasonable and necessary business costs. As a result, trustees' travel
costs remain allowable.
Comment: Trustees' travel costs should be allowable if they are reasonable. Some suggested
tests for reasonableness of trustees' travel costs are: limit number of allowed trips per year,
restriction of trips to organization's principal place of business or reasonable surroundings,
distinction between scheduled Board meetings and emergency Board meetings, and disallowance
of first-class airfare travels.
Response: All costs charged to Federal projects must satisfy a reasonableness test. Although
some of the suggested reasonableness tests appear to be good, OMB does not believe it is
necessary at this time to impose specific restrictions on trustees' travel expenses. The
reasonableness of a particular travel expense remains at the judgement of Federal negotiators.
Comment: At Head Start organizations, some Trustee members are first sent for training in the
operations of a Head Start program. These travel costs related to training should be allowable.
Response: Travel costs related to training and education are allowable, subject to limitations, and
are addressed in paragraph 53 of the Circular, Training and education costs.
Comment: At Head Start organizations, there often are several advisory boards in addition to the
Board of Trustees (or Directors). These advisory boards are involved in day-to-day operations of
the organizations and often incur travel costs. Are these costs subject to the same restrictions as
trustees' travel?
Response: Travel costs for members of advisory groups are allowable, subject to the limitations
in paragraph 55, Travel costs.
Multiple Allocation Basis (MAB)
Comment: The multiple allocation method for calculating indirect costs rates is much more
complicated and burdensome than the simplified method and it will cost non-profit organizations
much more to prepare the indirect cost proposal. Several commenters recommended the
flexibility of using one of the three different allocation methods as they are currently described in
the Circular. The multiple allocation basis (MAB) should remain an optional allocation
methodology rather than a required methodology for certain organizations.
Response: The use of MAB for major non-profit organizations promotes consistency in the
calculation and the reporting of indirect costs. It would facilitate the accumulation of indirect cost
data by cost components (i.e., facilities and administration) and provide comparable rates between
major research non-profit organizations and universities. However, OMB recognizes that a
conversion to MAB may require some substantial changes in the organization's accounting system
and that MAB is not practical for single-function organizations. Therefore, the Circular continues
to allow non-profit organizations to use any of the current three allocation methodologies.
Comment: Several commenters suggested raising the threshold for the requirement to $25 million
in direct Federal funding. Several commenters also suggested an exemption from this requirement
for single-function organizations regardless of Federal funding levels.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow the use of the current three allocation methodologies
for all non-profit organizations. For organizations that receive more than $10 million in direct
Federal funding, a breakout of indirect costs into two components, facilities and administration, is
required regardless of the selected allocation methodology.
Comment: The allocation methodology for general administration under MAB on the basis of
modified total direct costs conflicts with the required methodology under Cost Accounting
Standard (CAS) 410 applicable to contracts using the salaries and wages basis. One commenter
suggested that a fully CAS-covered non-profit organization be exempted from the MAB
requirement.
Response: MAB is not a requirement for non-profit organizations and remains one of the three
available methodologies in the Circular for computing indirect costs. In addition, CAS-covered
non-profit organizations should continue to follow CAS with respect to the measurement,
assignment and allocation of costs.
Comment: The revision should clarify that the modified total direct cost base should only include
the first $25,000 of a subcontract regardless of the period during which the project is started
(consistent with OMB Circular A-21).
Response: The modified total direct cost base, described in subparagraph D.3.f of the Circular,
includes the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract regardless of the period covered by the
subgrant or subcontract. Subgrant or subcontract costs above $25,000 shall be excluded from the
modified total direct cost base. For example, for a $300,000 subgrant that lasts three years, only
the first $25,000 incurred on the award should be included in the modified total direct cost base.
Administrative Cap of 26 percent
Comment: Most commenters strongly opposed the 26 percent administrative cap stating that
such limitation on cost reimbursement is arbitrary, capricious, and unnecessary. Some argued that
a cap would be financially disastrous to non-profit organizations because they receive most of
their funding from Federal sources (unlike universities). A detailed analysis is urged to determine
the average administrative costs applicable to non-profit organizations, if an administrative cap is
to be implemented at non-profit organizations.
Response: Based on the comments against the implementation of an administrative cap at non-profit organizations, OMB defers the consideration of establishing any administrative cap until better data on indirect costs at non-profit organizations can be collected. If OMB believes that an administrative cap should be implemented, it would be proposed in a subsequent notice.
Other
Comment: Attachment C of the Circular should be updated since a few listed organizations no longer exist.
Response: OMB agrees. Attachment C is updated to delete those organizations that no longer
exist or are no longer exempted from OMB Circular A-122.
Franklin D. Raines
Director
A. Attachment A
1. Add subparagraph 3 to paragraph C ("Indirect Costs").
3. Indirect costs shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and "Administration."
"Facilities" is defined as depreciation and use allowances on buildings, equipment and capital
improvement, interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital
improvements, and operations and maintenance expenses. "Administration" is defined as general
administration and general expenses such as the director's office, accounting, personnel, library
expenses and all other types of expenditures not listed specifically under one of the subcategories
of "Facilities" (including cross allocations from other pools, where applicable). See indirect cost
rate reporting requirements in subparagraphs D.2.e and D.3.g.
2. Add subparagraph 2.e to paragraph D.
e. For an organization that receives more than $10 million in Federal funding of direct costs in a
fiscal year, a breakout of the indirect cost component into two broad categories, Facilities and
Administration as defined in subparagraph C.3, is required. The rate in each case shall be stated
as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost category (i.e., Facilities or
Administration) is of the distribution base identified with that category.
3. Replace subparagraph D.3 with the following:
3. Multiple allocation base method.
a. General. Where an organization's indirect costs benefit its major functions in varying degrees,
indirect costs shall be accumulated into separate cost groupings, as described in subparagraph b.
Each grouping shall then be allocated individually to benefitting functions by means of a base
which best measures the relative benefits. The default allocation bases by cost pool are described
in subparagraph c.
b. Identification of indirect costs. Cost groupings shall be established so as to permit the
allocation of each grouping on the basis of benefits provided to the major functions. Each
grouping shall constitute a pool of expenses that are of like character in terms of functions they
benefit and in terms of the allocation base which best measures the relative benefits provided to
each function. The groupings are classified within the two broad categories: "Facilities" and
"Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3. The indirect cost pools are defined as
follows:
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. The expenses under this heading are the portion of the costs
of the organization's buildings, capital improvements to land and buildings, and equipment which
are computed in accordance with paragraph 11 of Attachment B ("Depreciation and use
allowances").
(2) Interest. Interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital
improvements are computed in accordance with paragraph 23 of Attachment B ("Interest, fund
raising, and investment management costs").
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. The expenses under this heading are those that have
been incurred for the administration, operation, maintenance, preservation, and protection of the
organization's physical plant. They include expenses normally incurred for such items as:
janitorial and utility services; repairs and ordinary or normal alterations of buildings, furniture and
equipment; care of grounds; maintenance and operation of buildings and other plant facilities;
security; earthquake and disaster preparedness; environmental safety; hazardous waste disposal;
property, liability and other insurance relating to property; space and capital leasing; facility
planning and management; and, central receiving. The operation and maintenance expenses
category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs, depreciation and use
allowances, and interest costs.
(4) General administration and general expenses. The expenses under this heading are those that
have been incurred for the overall general executive and administrative offices of the organization
and other expenses of a general nature which do not relate solely to any major function of the
organization. This category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs, operation
and maintenance expense, depreciation and use allowances, and interest costs. Examples of this
category include central offices, such as the director's office, the office of finance, business
services, budget and planning, personnel, safety and risk management, general counsel,
management information systems, and library costs.
In developing this cost pool, special care should be exercised to ensure that costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances are treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs. For example, salaries of technical staff, project supplies, project publication, telephone toll charges, computer costs, travel costs, and specialized services costs shall be treated as direct costs wherever identifiable to a particular program. The salaries and wages of administrative and pooled clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly requires and budgets for administrative or clerical services and other individuals involved can be identified with the program or activity. Items such as office supplies, postage, local telephone costs, periodicals and memberships should normally be treated as indirect costs.
c. Allocation bases. Actual conditions shall be taken into account in selecting the base to be used
in allocating the expenses in each grouping to benefitting functions. The essential consideration in
selecting a method or a base is that it is the one best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost
objectives in accordance with benefits derived; a traceable cause and effect relationship; or logic
and reason, where neither the cause nor the effect of the relationship is determinable. When an
allocation can be made by assignment of a cost grouping directly to the function benefited, the
allocation shall be made in that manner. When the expenses in a cost grouping are more general in
nature, the allocation shall be made through the use of a selected base which produces results that
are equitable to both the Federal Government and the organization. The distribution shall be
made in accordance with the bases described herein unless it can be demonstrated that the use of a
different base would result in a more equitable allocation of the costs, or that a more readily
available base would not increase the costs charged to sponsored awards. The results of special
cost studies (such as an engineering utility study) shall not be used to determine and allocate the
indirect costs to sponsored awards.
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. Depreciation and use allowances expenses shall be allocated
in the following manner:
(a) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used exclusively in the conduct of a single
function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in such buildings, shall be assigned to
that function.
(b) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used for more than one function, and on capital
improvements and equipment used in such buildings, shall be allocated to the individual functions
performed in each building on the basis of usable square feet of space, excluding common areas,
such as hallways, stairwells, and restrooms.
(c) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings, capital improvements and equipment related
space (e.g., individual rooms, and laboratories) used jointly by more than one function (as
determined by the users of the space) shall be treated as follows. The cost of each jointly used
unit of space shall be allocated to the benefitting functions on the basis of:
(i) the employees and other users on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis or salaries and wages of
those individual functions benefitting from the use of that space; or
(ii) organization-wide employee FTEs or salaries and wages applicable to the benefitting functions
of the organization.
(d) Depreciation or use allowances on certain capital improvements to land, such as paved
parking areas, fences, sidewalks, and the like, not included in the cost of buildings, shall be
allocated to user categories on a FTE basis and distributed to major functions in proportion to the
salaries and wages of all employees applicable to the functions.
(2) Interest. Interest costs shall be allocated in the same manner as the depreciation or use
allowances on the buildings, equipment and capital equipments to which the interest relates.
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. Operation and maintenance expenses shall be allocated
in the same manner as the depreciation and use allowances.
(4) General administration and general expenses. General administration and general expenses
shall be allocated to benefitting functions based on modified total direct costs (MTDC), as
described in subparagraph D.3.f. The expenses included in this category could be grouped first
according to major functions of the organization to which they render services or provide benefits.
The aggregate expenses of each group shall then be allocated to benefitting functions based on
MTDC.
d. Order of distribution.
(1) Indirect cost categories consisting of depreciation and use allowances, interest, operation and
maintenance, and general administration and general expenses shall be allocated in that order to
the remaining indirect cost categories as well as to the major functions of the organization. Other
cost categories could be allocated in the order determined to be most appropriate by the
organization. When cross allocation of costs is made as provided in subparagraph (2), this order
of allocation does not apply.
(2) Normally, an indirect cost category will be considered closed once it has been allocated to
other cost objectives, and costs shall not be subsequently allocated to it. However, a cross
allocation of costs between two or more indirect costs categories could be used if such allocation
will result in a more equitable allocation of costs. If a cross allocation is used, an appropriate
modification to the composition of the indirect cost categories is required.
e. Application of indirect cost rate or rates. Except where a special indirect cost rate(s) is
required in accordance with subparagraph D.5, the separate groupings of indirect costs allocated
to each major function shall be aggregated and treated as a common pool for that function. The
costs in the common pool shall then be distributed to individual awards included in that function
by use of a single indirect cost rate.
f. Distribution basis. Indirect costs shall be distributed to applicable sponsored awards and other
benefitting activities within each major function on the basis of MTDC. MTDC consists of all
salaries and wages, fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and subgrants and
subcontracts up to the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract (regardless of the period
covered by the subgrant or subcontract). Equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient
care, rental costs and the portion in excess of $25,000 shall be excluded from MTDC. Participant
support costs shall generally be excluded from MTDC. Other items may only be excluded when
the Federal cost cognizant agency determines that an exclusion is necessary to avoid a serious
inequity in the distribution of indirect costs.
g. Individual Rate Components. An indirect cost rate shall be determined for each separate indirect cost pool developed. The rate in each case shall be stated as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost pool is of the distribution base identified with that pool. Each indirect cost rate negotiation or determination agreement shall include development of the rate for each indirect cost pool as well as the overall indirect cost rate. The indirect cost pools shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and "Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3.
Revise the following cost items in Attachment B to Circular A-122 ("Selected Items of Cost").
1. Revise the Table of Contents for Attachment B to read:
1. Advertising and public relations costs
2. Alcoholic beverages
3. Bad debts
4. Bid and proposal costs (reserved)
5. Bonding costs
6. Communication costs
7. Compensation for personal services
8. Contingency provisions
9. Contributions
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent infringement
11. Depreciation and use allowances
12. Donations
13. Employee morale, health, and welfare costs and credits
14. Entertainment costs
15. Equipment and other capital expenditures
16. Fines and penalties
17. Fringe benefits
18. Goods or services for personal use
19. Housing and personal living expenses
20. Idle facilities and idle capacity
21. Independent research and development (reserved)
22. Insurance and indemnification
23. Interest, fund raising, and investment management costs
24. Labor relations costs
25. Lobbying costs
26. Losses on other awards
27. Maintenance and repair costs
28. Materials and supplies
29. Meetings and conferences
30. Memberships, subscriptions, and professional activity costs
31. Organization costs
32. Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums
33. Page charges in professional journals
34. Participant support costs
35. Patent costs
36. Pension plans
37. Plant security costs
38. Pre-award costs
39. Professional service costs
40. Profits and losses on disposition of depreciable property or other capital assets
41. Publication and printing costs
42. Rearrangement and alteration costs
43. Reconversion costs
44. Recruiting costs
45. Relocation costs
46. Rental costs
47. Royalties and other costs for use of patents and copyrights
48. Selling and marketing
49. Severance pay
50. Specialized service facilities
51. Taxes
52. Termination costs
53. Training and education costs
54. Transportation costs
55. Travel costs
56. Trustees
2. Revise and retitle paragraph 1 to read:
1. Advertising and public relations costs.
a. The term advertising costs means the costs of advertising media and corollary administrative
costs. Advertising media include magazines, newspapers, radio and television programs, direct
mail, exhibits, and the like.
b. The term public relations includes community relations and means those activities dedicated to
maintaining the image of the organization or maintaining or promoting understanding and
favorable relations with the community or public at large or any segment of the public.
c. The only allowable advertising costs are those which are solely for:
(1) The recruitment of personnel required for the performance by the organization of obligations
arising under a sponsored award, when considered in conjunction with all other recruitment costs,
as set forth in paragraph 44 ("Recruiting costs");
(2) The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a sponsored award;
(3) The disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired in the performance of a sponsored award
except when organizations are reimbursed for disposal costs at a predetermined amount in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, Sec.___.34, "Equipment"; or
(4) Other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the sponsored award.
d. The only allowable public relations costs are:
(1) Costs specifically required by sponsored awards;
(2) Costs of communicating with the public and press pertaining to specific activities or
accomplishments which result from performance of sponsored awards (these costs are considered
necessary as part of the outreach effort for the sponsored awards); or
(3) Costs of conducting general liaison with news media and government public relations officers,
to the extent that such activities are limited to communication and liaison necessary to keep the
public informed on matters of public concern, such as notices of contract/grant awards, financial
matters, etc.
e. Costs identified in subparagraphs c and d if incurred for more than one sponsored award or for
both sponsored work and other work of the organization, are allowable to the extent that the
principles in paragraphs B ("Direct Costs") and C ("Indirect Costs") of Attachment A are
observed.
f. Unallowable advertising and public relations costs include the following:
(1) All advertising and public relations costs other than as specified in subparagraphs c, d, and e;
(2) Costs of meetings or other events related to fund raising or other organizational activities
including:
(i) Costs of displays, demonstrations, and exhibits;
(ii) Costs of meeting rooms, hospitality suites, and other special facilities used in conjunction with
shows and other special events; and
(iii) Salaries and wages of employees or cost of services engaged in setting up and displaying
exhibits, making demonstrations, and providing briefings;
(3) Costs of promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts, and souvenirs;
(4) Costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to promote the organization.
3. Renumber current paragraphs 2 through 8 as paragraphs 3 through 9, respectively.
4. Add the following new paragraph 2:
2. Alcoholic beverages. Costs of alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
5. In paragraph 7 ("Compensation for personal services"), as renumbered above in item 3, rename
the current subparagraph g ("Pension costs"), as subparagraph h. Add a new subparagraph g:
g. Organization-furnished automobiles. That portion of the cost of organization-furnished
automobiles that relates to personal use by employees (including transportation to and from work)
is unallowable as fringe benefit or indirect costs regardless of whether the cost is reported as
taxable income to the employees. These costs are allowable as direct costs to sponsored award
when necessary for the performance of the sponsored award and approved by awarding agencies.
6. Renumber current paragraphs 9 through 15 as paragraphs 11 through 17, respectively.
7. Add new paragraph 10:
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent
infringement.
a. Definitions.
(1) Conviction, as used herein, means a judgment or a conviction of a criminal offense by any
court of competent jurisdiction, whether entered upon as a verdict or a plea, including a
conviction due to a plea of nolo contendere.
(2) Costs include, but are not limited to, administrative and clerical expenses; the cost of legal
services, whether performed by in-house or private counsel; and the costs of the services of
accountants, consultants, or others retained by the organization to assist it; costs of employees,
officers and trustees, and any similar costs incurred before, during, and after commencement of a
judicial or administrative proceeding that bears a direct relationship to the proceedings.
(3) Fraud, as used herein, means (i) acts of fraud corruption or attempts to defraud the Federal
Government or to corrupt its agents, (ii) acts that constitute a cause for debarment or suspension
(as specified in agency regulations), and (iii) acts which violate the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.,
sections 3729-3731, or the Anti-Kickback Act, 41 U.S.C., sections 51 and 54.
(4) Penalty does not include restitution, reimbursement, or compensatory damages.
(5) Proceeding includes an investigation.
b. (1) Except as otherwise described herein, costs incurred in connection with any criminal, civil
or administrative proceeding (including filing of a false certification) commenced by the Federal
Government, or a State, local or foreign government, are not allowable if the proceeding: (1)
relates to a violation of, or failure to comply with, a Federal, State, local or foreign statute or
regulation by the organization (including its agents and employees), and (2) results in any of the
following dispositions:
(a) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.
(b) In a civil or administrative proceeding involving an allegation of fraud or similar misconduct, a
determination of organizational liability.
(c) In the case of any civil or administrative proceeding, the imposition of a monetary penalty.
(d) A final decision by an appropriate Federal official to debar or suspend the organization, to
rescind or void an award, or to terminate an award for default by reason of a violation or failure
to comply with a law or regulation.
(e) A disposition by consent or compromise, if the action could have resulted in any of the
dispositions described in (a), (b), (c) or (d).
(2) If more than one proceeding involves the same alleged misconduct, the costs of all such
proceedings shall be unallowable if any one of them results in one of the dispositions shown in
subparagraph b.(1).
c. If a proceeding referred to in subparagraph b is commenced by the Federal Government and is
resolved by consent or compromise pursuant to an agreement entered into by the organization and
the Federal Government, then the costs incurred by the organization in connection with such
proceedings that are otherwise not allowable under subparagraph b may be allowed to the extent
specifically provided in such agreement.
d. If a proceeding referred to in subparagraph b is commenced by a State, local or foreign
government, the authorized Federal official may allow the costs incurred by the organization for
such proceedings, if such authorized official determines that the costs were incurred as a result of
(1) a specific term or condition of a federally-sponsored award, or (2) specific written direction of
an authorized official of the sponsoring agency.
e. Costs incurred in connection with proceedings described in subparagraph b, but which are not
made unallowable by that subparagraph, may be allowed by the Federal Government, but only to
the extent that:
(1) The costs are reasonable in relation to the activities required to deal with the proceeding and
the underlying cause of action;
(2) Payment of the costs incurred, as allowable and allocable costs, is not prohibited by any other
provision(s) of the sponsored award;
(3) The costs are not otherwise recovered from the Federal Government or a third party, either
directly as a result of the proceeding or otherwise; and,
(4) The percentage of costs allowed does not exceed the percentage determined by an authorized
Federal official to be appropriate, considering the complexity of the litigation, generally accepted
principles governing the award of legal fees in civil actions involving the United States as a party,
and such other factors as may be appropriate. Such percentage shall not exceed 80 percent.
However, if an agreement reached under subparagraph c has explicitly considered this 80 percent
limitation and permitted a higher percentage, then the full amount of costs resulting from that
agreement shall be allowable.
f. Costs incurred by the organization in connection with the defense of suits brought by its
employees or ex-employees under section 2 of the Major Fraud Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-700),
including the cost of all relief necessary to make such employee whole, where the organization
was found liable or settled, are unallowable.
g. Costs of legal, accounting, and consultant services, and related costs, incurred in connection
with defense against Federal Government claims or appeals, antitrust suits, or the prosecution of
claims or appeals against the Federal Government, are unallowable.
h. Costs of legal, accounting, and consultant services, and related costs, incurred in connection
with patent infringement litigation, are unallowable unless otherwise provided for in the sponsored
awards.
i. Costs which may be unallowable under this paragraph, including directly associated costs, shall
be segregated and accounted for by the organization separately. During the pendency of any
proceeding covered by subparagraphs b and f, the Federal Government shall generally withhold
payment of such costs. However, if in the best interests of the Federal Government, the Federal
Government may provide for conditional payment upon provision of adequate security, or other
adequate assurance, and agreements by the organization to repay all unallowable costs, plus
interest, if the costs are subsequently determined to be unallowable.
8. In paragraph 15 ("Equipment and other capital expenditures"), as renumbered in item 6 above,
replace subparagraphs 15.a.(1) and 15.b.(2) to read:
15.a.(1) "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable, tangible personal property having a
useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of (a)
the capitalization level established by the organization for the financial statement purposes, or (b)
$5000. The unamortized portion of any equipment written off as a result of a change in
capitalization levels may be recovered by continuing to claim the otherwise allowable use
allowances or depreciation on the equipment, or by amortizing the amount to be written off over a
period of years as negotiated with the Federal cognizant agency.
15.b.(2) Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs,
provided that items with a unit cost of $5000 or more have the prior approval of awarding
agency.
9. Renumber current paragraphs 16 through 36 as paragraphs 20 through 40, respectively.
10. Add new paragraph 18:
18. Goods or services for personal use. Costs of goods or services for personal use of the organization's employees are unallowable regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to the employees.
11. Add new paragraph 19:
19. Housing and personal living expenses.
a. Costs of housing (e.g., depreciation, maintenance, utilities, furnishings, rent, etc.), housing
allowances and personal living expenses for/of the organization's officers are unallowable as fringe
benefit or indirect costs regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to the
employees. These costs are allowable as direct costs to sponsored awards when necessary for the
performance of the sponsored award and approved by awarding agencies.
b. The term "officers" includes current and past officers and employees.
12. Add to paragraph 22.a.(2) ("Insurance and indemnification"), as renumbered in item 9, subparagraphs (f) and (g):
(f) Insurance against defects. Costs of insurance with respect to any costs incurred to correct
defects in the organization's materials or workmanship are unallowable.
(g) Medical liability (malpractice) insurance. Medical liability insurance is an allowable cost of
Federal research programs only to the extent that the Federal research programs involve human
subjects or training of participants in research techniques. Medical liability insurance costs shall
be treated as a direct cost and shall be assigned to individual projects based on the manner in
which the insurer allocates the risk to the population covered by the insurance.
13. Revise paragraph 30, as renumbered in item 9, to read:
30. Memberships, subscriptions and professional activity costs.
a. Costs of the organization's membership in business, technical, and professional organizations
are allowable.
b. Costs of the organization's subscriptions to business, professional, and technical periodicals
are allowable.
c. Costs of meetings and conferences, when the primary purpose is the dissemination of technical
information, are allowable. This includes costs of meals, transportation, rental of facilities, and
other items incidental to such meetings or conferences.
d. Costs of membership in any civic or community organization are allowable with prior approval
by Federal cognizant agency.
e. Costs of membership in any country club or social or dining club or organization are
unallowable.
14. Delete subparagraph 39.d, as renumbered in item 9.
15. Delete current paragraph 37 ("Public service costs").
16. Renumber current paragraphs 38 through 44 as paragraphs 41 through 47, respectively.
17. Revise paragraph 44, as renumbered in item 16, to read:
44. Recruiting costs.
a. Subject to subparagraphs b, c, and d, and provided that the size of the staff recruited and
maintained is in keeping with workload requirements, costs of "help wanted" advertising,
operating costs of an employment office necessary to secure and maintain an adequate staff, costs
of operating an aptitude and educational testing program, travel costs of employees while engaged
in recruiting personnel, travel costs of applicants for interviews for prospective employment, and
relocation costs incurred incident to recruitment of new employees, are allowable to the extent
that such costs are incurred pursuant to a well-managed recruitment program. Where the
organization uses employment agencies, costs that are not in excess of standard commercial rates
for such services are allowable.
b. In publications, costs of help wanted advertising that includes color, includes advertising
material for other than recruitment purposes, or is excessive in size (taking into consideration
recruitment purposes for which intended and normal organizational practices in this respect), are
unallowable.
c. Costs of help wanted advertising, special emoluments, fringe benefits, and salary allowances
incurred to attract professional personnel from other organizations that do not meet the test of
reasonableness or do not conform with the established practices of the organization, are
unallowable.
d. Where relocation costs incurred incident to recruitment of a new employee have been allowed
either as an allocable direct or indirect cost, and the newly hired employee resigns for reasons
within his control within twelve months after being hired, the organization will be required to
refund or credit such relocation costs to the Federal Government.
18. Renumber current paragraphs 45 through 51 as paragraphs 49 through 55, respectively.
19. Add new paragraph 48:
48. Selling and marketing. Costs of selling and marketing any products or services of the
organization (unless allowed under paragraph 1 as allowable public relations costs) are
unallowable. These costs, however, are allowable as direct costs, with prior approval by
awarding agencies, when they are necessary for the performance of Federal programs.
20. Add new subparagraphs c, d and e to paragraph 49 ("Severance pay"), as renumbered in item
18, as follow:
c. Costs incurred in certain severance pay packages (commonly known as "a golden parachute"
payment) which are in an amount in excess of the normal severance pay paid by the organization
to an employee upon termination of employment and are paid to the employee contingent upon a
change in management control over, or ownership of, the organization's assets are unallowable.
d. Severance payments to foreign nationals employed by the organization outside the United
States, to the extent that the amount exceeds the customary or prevailing practices for the
organization in the United States are unallowable, unless they are necessary for the performance
of Federal programs and approved by awarding agencies.
e. Severance payments to foreign nationals employed by the organization outside the United
States due to the termination of the foreign national as a result of the closing of, or curtailment of
activities by, the organization in that country, are unallowable, unless they are necessary for the
performance of Federal programs and approved by awarding agencies.
21. Add new paragraph 56:
56. Trustees. Travel and subsistence costs of trustees (or directors) are allowable. The costs are subject to restrictions regarding lodging, subsistence and air travel costs provided in paragraph 55.
1. Delete the following organizations from Attachment C. These organizations either no longer
exist or are no longer exempted from complying with Circular A-122.
2. Change Argonne Universities Association, Chicago, Illinois to Argonne National Laboratory,
Chicago, Illinois.
3. Change the location of the Institute for Defense Analysis in Virginia from Arlington to Alexandria.
4. Replace Midwest Research Institute, Headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri to National
Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
D. A recompilation of the entire Circular A-122, with all its amendments, follows:
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT: Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
1. Purpose. This Circular establishes principles for determining costs of grants, contracts and
other agreements with non-profit organizations. It does not apply to colleges and universities
which are covered by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21, "Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions"; State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments
which are covered by OMB Circular A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal
Governments"; or hospitals. The principles are designed to provide that the Federal Government
bear its fair share of costs except where restricted or prohibited by law. The principles do not
attempt to prescribe the extent of cost sharing or matching on grants, contracts, or other
agreements. However, such cost sharing or matching shall not be accomplished through arbitrary
limitations on individual cost elements by Federal agencies. Provision for profit or other
increment above cost is outside the scope of this Circular.
2. Supersession. This Circular supersedes cost principles issued by individual agencies for
non-profit organizations.
3. Applicability.
a. These principles shall be used by all Federal agencies in determining the costs of work performed by non-profit organizations under grants, cooperative agreements, cost reimbursement contracts, and other contracts in which costs are used in pricing, administration, or settlement. All of these instruments are hereafter referred to as awards. The principles do not apply to awards under which an organization is not required to account to the Federal Government for actual costs incurred.
b. All cost reimbursement subawards (subgrants, subcontracts, etc.) are subject to those Federal
cost principles applicable to the particular organization concerned. Thus, if a subaward is to a
non-profit organization, this Circular shall apply; if a subaward is to a commercial organization,
the cost principles applicable to commercial concerns shall apply; if a subaward is to a college or
university, Circular A-21 shall apply; if a subaward is to a State, local, or federally-recognized
Indian tribal government, Circular A-87 shall apply.
4. Definitions.
a. Non-profit organization means any corporation, trust, association, cooperative, or other organization which:
(1) is operated primarily for scientific, educational, service, charitable, or similar purposes in the public interest;
(2) is not organized primarily for profit; and
(3) uses its net proceeds to maintain, improve, and/or expand its operations. For this purpose, the term "non-profit organization" excludes (i) colleges and universities; (ii) hospitals; (iii) State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments; and (iv) those non-profit organizations which are excluded from coverage of this Circular in accordance with paragraph 5.
b. Prior approval means securing the awarding agency's permission in advance to incur cost for
those items that are designated as requiring prior approval by the Circular. Generally this
permission will be in writing. Where an item of cost requiring prior approval is specified in the
budget of an award, approval of the budget constitutes approval of that cost.
5. Exclusion of some non-profit organizations. Some non-profit organizations, because of their
size and nature of operations, can be considered to be similar to commercial concerns for purpose
of applicability of cost principles. Such non-profit organizations shall operate under Federal cost
principles applicable to commercial concerns. A listing of these organizations is contained in
Attachment C. Other organizations may be added from time to time.
6. Responsibilities. Agencies responsible for administering programs that involve awards to
non-profit organizations shall implement the provisions of this Circular. Upon request,
implementing instruction shall be furnished to OMB. Agencies shall designate a liaison official to
serve as the agency representative on matters relating to the implementation of this Circular. The
name and title of such representative shall be furnished to OMB within 30 days of the date of this
Circular.
7. Attachments. The principles and related policy guides are set forth in the following
Attachments:
Attachment A - General Principles
Attachment B - Selected Items of Cost
Attachment C - Non-Profit Organizations Not Subject To This Circular
8. Requests for exceptions. OMB may grant exceptions to the requirements of this Circular
when permissible under existing law. However, in the interest of achieving maximum uniformity,
exceptions will be permitted only in highly unusual circumstances.
9. Effective Date. The provisions of this Circular are effective immediately. Implementation shall
be phased in by incorporating the provisions into new awards made after the start of the
organization's next fiscal year. For existing awards, the new principles may be applied if an
organization and the cognizant Federal agency agree. Earlier implementation, or a delay in
implementation of individual provisions, is also permitted by mutual agreement between an
organization and the cognizant Federal agency.
10. Inquiries. Further information concerning this Circular may be obtained by contacting the
Office of Federal Financial Management, OMB, Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202)
395-3993.
Attachments
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Table of Contents
A. Basic Considerations
1. Composition of total costs
2. Factors affecting allowability of costs
3. Reasonable costs
4. Allocable costs
5. Applicable credits
6. Advance understandings
7. Conditional exemptions
B. Direct Costs
C. Indirect Costs
D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and Determination of Indirect Cost Rates
1. General
2. Simplified allocation method
3. Multiple allocation base method
4. Direct allocation method
5. Special indirect cost rates
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost Rates
1. Definitions
2. Negotiation and approval of rates
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
A. Basic Considerations
1. Composition of total costs. The total cost of an award is the sum of the allowable direct and
allocable indirect costs less any applicable credits.
2. Factors affecting allowability of costs. To be allowable under an award, costs must meet the
following general criteria:
a. Be reasonable for the performance of the award and be allocable thereto under these principles.
b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the award as to types or amount of cost items.
c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the organization.
d. Be accorded consistent treatment.
e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period.
g. Be adequately documented.
3. Reasonable costs. A cost is reasonable if, in its nature or amount, it does not exceed that which
would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision
was made to incur the costs. The question of the reasonableness of specific costs must be
scrutinized with particular care in connection with organizations or separate divisions thereof
which receive the preponderance of their support from awards made by Federal agencies. In
determining the reasonableness of a given cost, consideration shall be given to:
a. Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the organization or the performance of the award.
b. The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as generally accepted sound business practices, arms length bargaining, Federal and State laws and regulations, and terms and conditions of the award.
c. Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances, considering their responsibilities to the organization, its members, employees, and clients, the public at large, and the Federal Government.
d. Significant deviations from the established practices of the organization which may
unjustifiably increase the award costs.
4. Allocable costs.
a. A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective, such as a grant, contract, project, service, or other activity, in accordance with the relative benefits received. A cost is allocable to a Federal award if it is treated consistently with other costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances and if it:
(1) Is incurred specifically for the award.
(2) Benefits both the award and other work and can be distributed in reasonable proportion to the benefits received, or
(3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the organization, although a direct relationship to any particular cost objective cannot be shown.
b. Any cost allocable to a particular award or other cost objective under these principles may not
be shifted to other Federal awards to overcome funding deficiencies, or to avoid restrictions
imposed by law or by the terms of the award.
5. Applicable credits.
a. The term applicable credits refers to those receipts, or reduction of expenditures which operate to offset or reduce expense items that are allocable to awards as direct or indirect costs. Typical examples of such transactions are: purchase discounts, rebates or allowances, recoveries or indemnities on losses, insurance refunds, and adjustments of overpayments or erroneous charges. To the extent that such credits accruing or received by the organization relate to allowable cost, they shall be credited to the Federal Government either as a cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate.
b. In some instances, the amounts received from the Federal Government to finance
organizational activities or service operations should be treated as applicable credits. Specifically,
the concept of netting such credit items against related expenditures should be applied by the
organization in determining the rates or amounts to be charged to Federal awards for services
rendered whenever the facilities or other resources used in providing such services have been
financed directly, in whole or in part, by Federal funds.
c. For rules covering program income (i.e., gross income earned from federally-supported
activities) see Sec. __.24 of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110, "Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations."
6. Advance understandings. Under any given award, the reasonableness and allocability of
certain items of costs may be difficult to determine. This is particularly true in connection with
organizations that receive a preponderance of their support from Federal agencies. In order to
avoid subsequent disallowance or dispute based on unreasonableness or nonallocability, it is often
desirable to seek a written agreement with the cognizant or awarding agency in advance of the
incurrence of special or unusual costs. The absence of an advance agreement on any element of
cost will not, in itself, affect the reasonableness or allocability of that element.
7. Conditional exemptions.
a. OMB authorizes conditional exemption from OMB administrative requirements and cost
principles circulars for certain Federal programs with statutorily-authorized consolidated planning
and consolidated administrative funding, that are identified by a Federal agency and approved by
the head of the Executive department or establishment. A Federal agency shall consult with OMB
during its consideration of whether to grant such an exemption.
b. To promote efficiency in State and local program administration, when Federal
non-entitlement programs with common purposes have specific statutorily-authorized
consolidated planning and consolidated administrative funding and where most of the State
agency's resources come from non-Federal sources, Federal agencies may exempt these covered
State-administered, non-entitlement grant programs from certain OMB grants management
requirements. The exemptions would be from all but the allocability of costs provisions of OMB
Circulars A-87 (Attachment A, subsection C.3), "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments," A-21 (Section C, subpart 4), "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions,"
and A-122 (Attachment A, subsection A.4), "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations," and
from all of the administrative requirements provisions of OMB Circular A-110, "Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations," and the agencies' grants management common
rule.
c. When a Federal agency provides this flexibility, as a prerequisite to a State's exercising this
option, a State must adopt its own written fiscal and administrative requirements for expending
and accounting for all funds, which are consistent with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87, and
extend such policies to all subrecipients. These fiscal and administrative requirements must be
sufficiently specific to ensure that: funds are used in compliance with all applicable Federal
statutory and regulatory provisions, costs are reasonable and necessary for operating these
programs, and funds are not be used for general expenses required to carry out other
responsibilities of a State or its subrecipients.
B. Direct Costs
1. Direct costs are those that can be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective,
i.e., a particular award, project, service, or other direct activity of an organization. However, a
cost may not be assigned to an award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same
purpose, in like circumstance, has been allocated to an award as an indirect cost. Costs identified
specifically with awards are direct costs of the awards and are to be assigned directly thereto.
Costs identified specifically with other final cost objectives of the organization are direct costs of
those cost objectives and are not to be assigned to other awards directly or indirectly.
2. Any direct cost of a minor amount may be treated as an indirect cost for reasons of practicality
where the accounting treatment for such cost is consistently applied to all final cost objectives.
3. The cost of certain activities are not allowable as charges to Federal awards (see, for example,
fundraising costs in paragraph 23 of Attachment B). However, even though these costs are
unallowable for purposes of computing charges to Federal awards, they nonetheless must be
treated as direct costs for purposes of determining indirect cost rates and be allocated their share
of the organization's indirect costs if they represent activities which (1) include the salaries of
personnel, (2) occupy space, and (3) benefit from the organization's indirect costs.
4. The costs of activities performed primarily as a service to members, clients, or the general
public when significant and necessary to the organization's mission must be treated as direct costs
whether or not allowable and be allocated an equitable share of indirect costs. Some examples of
these types of activities include:
a. Maintenance of membership rolls, subscriptions, publications, and related functions.
b. Providing services and information to members, legislative or administrative bodies, or the public.
c. Promotion, lobbying, and other forms of public relations.
d. Meetings and conferences except those held to conduct the general administration of the organization.
e. Maintenance, protection, and investment of special funds not used in operation of the organization.
f. Administration of group benefits on behalf of members or clients, including life and hospital
insurance, annuity or retirement plans, financial aid, etc.
C. Indirect Costs
1. Indirect costs are those that have been incurred for common or joint objectives and cannot be
readily identified with a particular final cost objective. Direct cost of minor amounts may be
treated as indirect costs under the conditions described in subparagraph B.2. After direct costs
have been determined and assigned directly to awards or other work as appropriate, indirect costs
are those remaining to be allocated to benefiting cost objectives. A cost may not be allocated to
an award as an indirect cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances,
has been assigned to an award as a direct cost.
2. Because of the diverse characteristics and accounting practices of non-profit organizations, it
is not possible to specify the types of cost which may be classified as indirect cost in all situations.
However, typical examples of indirect cost for many non-profit organizations may include
depreciation or use allowances on buildings and equipment, the costs of operating and maintaining
facilities, and general administration and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of
executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting.
3. Indirect costs shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and "Administration."
"Facilities" is defined as depreciation and use allowances on buildings, equipment and capital
improvement, interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital
improvements, and operations and maintenance expenses. "Administration" is defined as general
administration and general expenses such as the director's office, accounting, personnel, library
expenses and all other types of expenditures not listed specifically under one of the subcategories
of "Facilities" (including cross allocations from other pools, where applicable). See indirect cost
rate reporting requirements in subparagraphs D.2.e and D.3.g.
D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and Determination of Indirect Cost Rates
1. General.
a. Where a non-profit organization has only one major function, or where all its major functions benefit from its indirect costs to approximately the same degree, the allocation of indirect costs and the computation of an indirect cost rate may be accomplished through simplified allocation procedures, as described in subparagraph 2.
b. Where an organization has several major functions which benefit from its indirect costs in
varying degrees, allocation of indirect costs may require the accumulation of such costs into
separate cost groupings which then are allocated individually to benefiting functions by means of a
base which best measures the relative degree of benefit. The indirect costs allocated to each
function are then distributed to individual awards and other activities included in that function by
means of an indirect cost rate(s).
c. The determination of what constitutes an organization's major functions will depend on its purpose in being; the types of services it renders to the public, its clients, and its members; and the amount of effort it devotes to such activities as fundraising, public information and membership activities.
d. Specific methods for allocating indirect costs and computing indirect cost rates along with the
conditions under which each method should be used are described in subparagraphs 2 through
5.
e. The base period for the allocation of indirect costs is the period in which such costs are
incurred and accumulated for allocation to work performed in that period. The base period
normally should coincide with the organization's fiscal year but, in any event, shall be so selected
as to avoid inequities in the allocation of the costs.
2. Simplified allocation method.
a. Where an organization's major functions benefit from its indirect costs to approximately the same degree, the allocation of indirect costs may be accomplished by (i) separating the organization's total costs for the base period as either direct or indirect, and (ii) dividing the total allowable indirect costs (net of applicable credits) by an equitable distribution base. The result of this process is an indirect cost rate which is used to distribute indirect costs to individual awards. The rate should be expressed as the percentage which the total amount of allowable indirect costs bears to the base selected. This method should also be used where an organization has only one major function encompassing a number of individual projects or activities, and may be used where the level of Federal awards to an organization is relatively small.
b. Both the direct costs and the indirect costs shall exclude capital expenditures and unallowable costs. However, unallowable costs which represent activities must be included in the direct costs under the conditions described in subparagraph B.3.
c. The distribution base may be total direct costs (excluding capital expenditures and other distorting items, such as major subcontracts or subgrants), direct salaries and wages, or other base which results in an equitable distribution. The distribution base shall generally exclude participant support costs as defined in paragraph 34 of Attachment B.
d. Except where a special rate(s) is required in accordance with subparagraph 5, the indirect
cost rate developed under the above principles is applicable to all awards at the organization. If a
special rate(s) is required, appropriate modifications shall be made in order to develop the special
rate(s).
e. For an organization that receives more than $10 million in Federal funding of direct costs in a
fiscal year, a breakout of the indirect cost component into two broad categories, Facilities and
Administration as defined in subparagraph C.3, is required. The rate in each case shall be stated
as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost category (i.e., Facilities or
Administration) is of the distribution base identified with that category.
3. Multiple allocation base method
a. General. Where an organization's indirect costs benefit its major functions in varying degrees,
indirect costs shall be accumulated into separate cost groupings, as described in subparagraph b.
Each grouping shall then be allocated individually to benefitting functions by means of a base
which best measures the relative benefits. The default allocation bases by cost pool are described
in subparagraph c.
b. Identification of indirect costs. Cost groupings shall be established so as to permit the
allocation of each grouping on the basis of benefits provided to the major functions. Each
grouping shall constitute a pool of expenses that are of like character in terms of functions they
benefit and in terms of the allocation base which best measures the relative benefits provided to
each function. The groupings are classified within the two broad categories: "Facilities" and
"Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3. The indirect cost pools are defined as
follows:
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. The expenses under this heading are the portion of the costs
of the organization's buildings, capital improvements to land and buildings, and equipment which
are computed in accordance with paragraph 11 of Attachment B ("Depreciation and use
allowances").
(2) Interest. Interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital
improvements are computed in accordance with paragraph 23 of Attachment B ("Interest,
fundraising, and investment management costs").
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. The expenses under this heading are those that have
been incurred for the administration, operation, maintenance, preservation, and protection of the
organization's physical plant. They include expenses normally incurred for such items as:
janitorial and utility services; repairs and ordinary or normal alterations of buildings, furniture and
equipment; care of grounds; maintenance and operation of buildings and other plant facilities;
security; earthquake and disaster preparedness; environmental safety; hazardous waste disposal;
property, liability and other insurance relating to property; space and capital leasing; facility
planning and management; and, central receiving. The operation and maintenance expenses
category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs, depreciation and use
allowances, and interest costs.
(4) General administration and general expenses. The expenses under this heading are those that
have been incurred for the overall general executive and administrative offices of the organization
and other expenses of a general nature which do not relate solely to any major function of the
organization. This category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs, operation
and maintenance expense, depreciation and use allowances, and interest costs. Examples of this
category include central offices, such as the director's office, the office of finance, business
services, budget and planning, personnel, safety and risk management, general counsel,
management information systems, and library costs.
In developing this cost pool, special care should be exercised to ensure that costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances are treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs. For example, salaries of technical staff, project supplies, project publication, telephone toll charges, computer costs, travel costs, and specialized services costs shall be treated as direct costs wherever identifiable to a particular program. The salaries and wages of administrative and pooled clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly requires and budgets for administrative or clerical services and other individuals involved can be identified with the program or activity. Items such as office supplies, postage, local telephone costs, periodicals and memberships should normally be treated as indirect costs.
c. Allocation bases. Actual conditions shall be taken into account in selecting the base to be used
in allocating the expenses in each grouping to benefitting functions. The essential consideration in
selecting a method or a base is that it is the one best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost
objectives in accordance with benefits derived; a traceable cause and effect relationship; or logic
and reason, where neither the cause nor the effect of the relationship is determinable. When an
allocation can be made by assignment of a cost grouping directly to the function benefited, the
allocation shall be made in that manner. When the expenses in a cost grouping are more general in
nature, the allocation shall be made through the use of a selected base which produces results that
are equitable to both the Federal Government and the organization. The distribution shall be
made in accordance with the bases described herein unless it can be demonstrated that the use of a
different base would result in a more equitable allocation of the costs, or that a more readily
available base would not increase the costs charged to sponsored awards. The results of special
cost studies (such as an engineering utility study) shall not be used to determine and allocate the
indirect costs to sponsored awards.
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. Depreciation and use allowances expenses shall be allocated
in the following manner:
(a) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used exclusively in the conduct of a single
function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in such buildings, shall be assigned to
that function.
(b) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used for more than one function, and on capital
improvements and equipment used in such buildings, shall be allocated to the individual functions
performed in each building on the basis of usable square feet of space, excluding common areas,
such as hallways, stairwells, and restrooms.
(c) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings, capital improvements and equipment related
space (e.g., individual rooms, and laboratories) used jointly by more than one function (as
determined by the users of the space) shall be treated as follows. The cost of each jointly used
unit of space shall be allocated to the benefitting functions on the basis of:
(i) the employees and other users on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis or salaries and wages of
those individual functions benefitting from the use of that space; or
(ii) organization-wide employee FTEs or salaries and wages applicable to the benefitting functions
of the organization.
(d) Depreciation or use allowances on certain capital improvements to land, such as paved
parking areas, fences, sidewalks, and the like, not included in the cost of buildings, shall be
allocated to user categories on a FTE basis and distributed to major functions in proportion to the
salaries and wages of all employees applicable to the functions.
(2) Interest. Interest costs shall be allocated in the same manner as the depreciation or use
allowances on the buildings, equipment and capital equipments to which the interest relates.
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. Operation and maintenance expenses shall be allocated
in the same manner as the depreciation and use allowances.
(4) General administration and general expenses. General administration and general expenses
shall be allocated to benefitting functions based on modified total direct costs (MTDC), as
described in subparagraph D.3.f. The expenses included in this category could be grouped first
according to major functions of the organization to which they render services or provide benefits.
The aggregate expenses of each group shall then be allocated to benefitting functions based on
MTDC.
d. Order of distribution.
(1) Indirect cost categories consisting of depreciation and use allowances, interest, operation and
maintenance, and general administration and general expenses shall be allocated in that order to
the remaining indirect cost categories as well as to the major functions of the organization. Other
cost categories could be allocated in the order determined to be most appropriate by the
organization. When cross allocation of costs is made as provided in subparagraph (2), this order
of allocation does not apply.
(2) Normally, an indirect cost category will be considered closed once it has been allocated to
other cost objectives, and costs shall not be subsequently allocated to it. However, a cross
allocation of costs between two or more indirect costs categories could be used if such allocation
will result in a more equitable allocation of costs. If a cross allocation is used, an appropriate
modification to the composition of the indirect cost categories is required.
e. Application of indirect cost rate or rates. Except where a special indirect cost rate(s) is
required in accordance with subparagraph D.5, the separate groupings of indirect costs allocated
to each major function shall be aggregated and treated as a common pool for that function. The
costs in the common pool shall then be distributed to individual awards included in that function
by use of a single indirect cost rate.
f. Distribution basis. Indirect costs shall be distributed to applicable sponsored awards and other
benefitting activities within each major function on the basis of MTDC. MTDC consists of all
salaries and wages, fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and subgrants and
subcontracts up to the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract (regardless of the period
covered by the subgrant or subcontract). Equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient
care, rental costs and the portion in excess of $25,000 shall be excluded from MTDC. Participant
support costs shall generally be excluded from MTDC. Other items may only be excluded when
the Federal cost cognizant agency determines that an exclusion is necessary to avoid a serious
inequity in the distribution of indirect costs.
g. Individual Rate Components. An indirect cost rate shall be determined for each separate
indirect cost pool developed. The rate in each case shall be stated as the percentage which the
amount of the particular indirect cost pool is of the distribution base identified with that pool.
Each indirect cost rate negotiation or determination agreement shall include development of the
rate for each indirect cost pool as well as the overall indirect cost rate. The indirect cost pools
shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and "Administration," as described in
subparagraph C.3.
4. Direct allocation method.
a. Some non-profit organizations treat all costs as direct costs except general administration and
general expenses. These organizations generally separate their costs into three basic categories:
(i) General administration and general expenses, (ii) fundraising, and (iii) other direct functions
(including projects performed under Federal awards). Joint costs, such as depreciation, rental
costs, operation and maintenance of facilities, telephone expenses, and the like are prorated
individually as direct costs to each category and to each award or other activity using a base most
appropriate to the particular cost being prorated.
b. This method is acceptable, provided each joint cost is prorated using a base which accurately measures the benefits provided to each award or other activity. The bases must be established in accordance with reasonable criteria, and be supported by current data. This method is compatible with the Standards of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations issued jointly by the National Health Council, Inc., the National Assembly of Voluntary Health and Social Welfare Organizations, and the United Way of America.
c. Under this method, indirect costs consist exclusively of general administration and general
expenses. In all other respects, the organization's indirect cost rates shall be computed in the
same manner as that described in subparagraph 2.
5. Special indirect cost rates. In some instances, a single indirect cost rate for all activities of an
organization or for each major function of the organization may not be appropriate, since it would
not take into account those different factors which may substantially affect the indirect costs
applicable to a particular segment of work. For this purpose, a particular segment of work may
be that performed under a single award or it may consist of work under a group of awards
performed in a common environment. These factors may include the physical location of the
work, the level of administrative support required, the nature of the facilities or other resources
employed, the scientific disciplines or technical skills involved, the organizational arrangements
used, or any combination thereof. When a particular segment of work is performed in an
environment which appears to generate a significantly different level of indirect costs, provisions
should be made for a separate indirect cost pool applicable to such work. The separate indirect
cost pool should be developed during the course of the regular allocation process, and the
separate indirect cost rate resulting therefrom should be used, provided it is determined that (i)
the rate differs significantly from that which would have been obtained under subparagraphs 2,
3, and 4, and (ii) the volume of work to which the rate would apply is material.
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost Rates
1. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
a. Cognizant agency means the Federal agency responsible for negotiating and approving indirect cost rates for a non-profit organization on behalf of all Federal agencies.
b. Predetermined rate means an indirect cost rate, applicable to a specified current or future period, usually the organization's fiscal year. The rate is based on an estimate of the costs to be incurred during the period. A predetermined rate is not subject to adjustment.
c. Fixed rate means an indirect cost rate which has the same characteristics as a predetermined rate, except that the difference between the estimated costs and the actual costs of the period covered by the rate is carried forward as an adjustment to the rate computation of a subsequent period.
d. Final rate means an indirect cost rate applicable to a specified past period which is based on the actual costs of the period. A final rate is not subject to adjustment.
e. Provisional rate or billing rate means a temporary indirect cost rate applicable to a specified period which is used for funding, interim reimbursement, and reporting indirect costs on awards pending the establishment of a final rate for the period.
f. Indirect cost proposal means the documentation prepared by an organization to substantiate its claim for the reimbursement of indirect costs. This proposal provides the basis for the review and negotiation leading to the establishment of an organization's indirect cost rate.
g. Cost objective means a function, organizational subdivision, contract, grant, or other work unit
for which cost data are desired and for which provision is made to accumulate and measure the
cost of processes, projects, jobs and capitalized projects.
2. Negotiation and approval of rates.
a. Unless different arrangements are agreed to by the agencies concerned, the Federal agency with the largest dollar value of awards with an organization will be designated as the cognizant agency for the negotiation and approval of the indirect cost rates and, where necessary, other rates such as fringe benefit and computer charge-out rates. Once an agency is assigned cognizance for a particular non-profit organization, the assignment will not be changed unless there is a major long-term shift in the dollar volume of the Federal awards to the organization. All concerned Federal agencies shall be given the opportunity to participate in the negotiation process but, after a rate has been agreed upon, it will be accepted by all Federal agencies. When a Federal agency has reason to believe that special operating factors affecting its awards necessitate special indirect cost rates in accordance with subparagraph D.5, it will, prior to the time the rates are negotiated, notify the cognizant agency.
b. A non-profit organization which has not previously established an indirect cost rate with a Federal agency shall submit its initial indirect cost proposal immediately after the organization is advised that an award will be made and, in no event, later than three months after the effective date of the award.
c. Organizations that have previously established indirect cost rates must submit a new indirect cost proposal to the cognizant agency within six months after the close of each fiscal year.
d. A predetermined rate may be negotiated for use on awards where there is reasonable assurance, based on past experience and reliable projection of the organization's costs, that the rate is not likely to exceed a rate based on the organization's actual costs.
e. Fixed rates may be negotiated where predetermined rates are not considered appropriate. A
fixed rate, however, shall not be negotiated if (i) all or a substantial portion of the organization's
awards are expected to expire before the carry-forward adjustment can be made; (ii) the mix of
Federal and non-Federal work at the organization is too erratic to permit an equitable
carry-forward adjustment; or (iii) the organization's operations fluctuate significantly from year to
year.
f. Provisional and final rates shall be negotiated where neither predetermined nor fixed rates are appropriate.
g. The results of each negotiation shall be formalized in a written agreement between the cognizant agency and the non-profit organization. The cognizant agency shall distribute copies of the agreement to all concerned Federal agencies.
h. If a dispute arises in a negotiation of an indirect cost rate between the cognizant agency and the non-profit organization, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the appeals procedures of the cognizant agency.
i. To the extent that problems are encountered among the Federal agencies in connection with the negotiation and approval process, OMB will lend assistance as required to resolve such problems in a timely manner.
SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
Table of Contents
1. Advertising and public relations costs
2. Alcoholic beverages
3. Bad debts
4. Bid and proposal costs (reserved)
5. Bonding costs
6. Communication costs
7. Compensation for personal services
8. Contingency provisions
9. Contributions
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent infringement
11. Depreciation and use allowances
12. Donations
13. Employee morale, health, and welfare costs and credits
14. Entertainment costs
15. Equipment and other capital expenditures
16. Fines and penalties
17. Fringe benefits
18. Goods or services for personal use
19. Housing and personal living expenses
20. Idle facilities and idle capacity
21. Independent research and development (reserved)
22. Insurance and indemnification
23. Interest, fund raising, and investment management costs
24. Labor relations costs
25. Lobbying
26. Losses on other awards
27. Maintenance and repair costs
28. Materials and supplies
29. Meetings and conferences
30. Memberships, subscriptions, and professional activity costs
31. Organization costs
32. Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums
33. Page charges in professional journals
34. Participant support costs
35. Patent costs
36. Pension plans
37. Plant security costs
38. Pre-award costs
39. Professional service costs
40. Profits and losses on disposition of depreciable property or other capital assets
41. Publication and printing costs
42. Rearrangement and alteration costs
43. Reconversion costs
44. Recruiting costs
45. Relocation costs
46. Rental costs
47. Royalties and other costs for use of patents and copyrights
48. Selling and marketing
49. Severance pay
50. Specialized service facilities
51. Taxes
52. Termination costs
53. Training and education costs
54. Transportation costs
55. Travel costs
56. Trustees
SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
Paragraphs 1 through 56 provide principles to be applied in establishing the allowability of
certain items of cost. These principles apply whether a cost is treated as direct or indirect. Failure
to mention a particular item of cost is not intended to imply that it is unallowable; rather,
determination as to allowability in each case should be based on the treatment or principles
provided for similar or related items of cost.
1. Advertising and public relations costs.
a. The term advertising costs means the costs of advertising media and corollary administrative
costs. Advertising media include magazines, newspapers, radio and television programs, direct
mail, exhibits, and the like.
b. The term public relations includes community relations and means those activities dedicated to
maintaining the image of the organization or maintaining or promoting understanding and
favorable relations with the community or public at large or any segment of the public.
c. The only allowable advertising costs are those which are solely for:
(1) The recruitment of personnel required for the performance by the organization of obligations
arising under a sponsored award, when considered in conjunction with all other recruitment costs,
as set forth in paragraph 44 ("Recruiting costs");
(2) The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a sponsored award;
(3) The disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired in the performance of a sponsored award
except when organizations are reimbursed for disposal costs at a predetermined amount in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, Sec.___.34, "Equipment"; or
(4) Other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the sponsored award.
d. The only allowable public relations costs are:
(1) Costs specifically required by sponsored awards;
(2) Costs of communicating with the public and press pertaining to specific activities or
accomplishments which result from performance of sponsored awards (these costs are considered
necessary as part of the outreach effort for the sponsored awards); or
(3) Costs of conducting general liaison with news media and government public relations officers,
to the extent that such activities are limited to communication and liaison necessary to keep the
public informed on matters of public concern, such as notices of contract/grant awards, financial
matters, etc.
e. Costs identified in subparagraphs c and d if incurred for more than one sponsored award or
for both sponsored work and other work of the organization, are allowable to the extent that the
principles in paragraphs B ("Direct Costs") and C ("Indirect Costs") of Attachment A are
observed.
f. Unallowable advertising and public relations costs include the following:
(1) All advertising and public relations costs other than as specified in subparagraphs c, d, and
e;
(2) Costs of meetings or other events related to fund raising or other organizational activities
including:
(i) Costs of displays, demonstrations, and exhibits;
(ii) Costs of meeting rooms, hospitality suites, and other special facilities used in conjunction with
shows and other special events; and
(iii) Salaries and wages of employees or cost of services engaged in setting up and displaying
exhibits, making demonstrations, and providing briefings;
(3) Costs of promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts, and souvenirs;
(4) Costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to promote the organization.
2. Alcoholic beverages. Costs of alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
3. Bad debts. Bad debts, including losses (whether actual or estimated) arising from
uncollectible accounts and other claims, related collection costs, and related legal costs, are
unallowable.
4. Bid and proposal costs. (reserved)
5. Bonding costs.
a. Bonding costs arise when the Federal Government requires assurance against financial loss to itself or others by reason of the act or default of the organization. They arise also in instances where the organization requires similar assurance. Included are such bonds as bid, performance, payment, advance payment, infringement, and fidelity bonds.
b. Costs of bonding required pursuant to the terms of the award are allowable.
c. Costs of bonding required by the organization in the general conduct of its operations are
allowable to the extent that such bonding is in accordance with sound business practice and the
rates and premiums are reasonable under the circumstances.
6. Communication costs. Costs incurred for telephone services, local and long distance telephone
calls, telegrams, radiograms, postage and the like are allowable.
7. Compensation for personal services.
a. Definition. Compensation for personal services includes all compensation paid currently or accrued by the organization for services of employees rendered during the period of the award (except as otherwise provided in subparagraph h). It includes, but is not limited to, salaries, wages, director's and executive committee member's fees, incentive awards, fringe benefits, pension plan costs, allowances for off-site pay, incentive pay, location allowances, hardship pay, and cost of living differentials.
b. Allowability. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this paragraph, the costs of such compensation are allowable to the extent that:
(1) Total compensation to individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established policy of the organization consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; and
(2) Charges to awards whether treated as direct or indirect costs are determined and supported as required in this paragraph.
c. Reasonableness.
(1) When the organization is predominantly engaged in activities other than those sponsored by
the Federal Government, compensation for employees on federally-sponsored work will be
considered reasonable to the extent that it is consistent with that paid for similar work in the
organization's other activities.
(2) When the organization is predominantly engaged in federally-sponsored activities and in cases where the kind of employees required for the Federal activities are not found in the organization's other activities, compensation for employees on federally-sponsored work will be considered reasonable to the extent that it is comparable to that paid for similar work in the labor markets in which the organization competes for the kind of employees involved.
d. Special considerations in determining allowability. Certain conditions require special consideration and possible limitations in determining costs under Federal awards where amounts or types of compensation appear unreasonable. Among such conditions are the following:
(1) Compensation to members of non-profit organizations, trustees, directors, associates, officers, or the immediate families thereof. Determination should be made that such compensation is reasonable for the actual personal services rendered rather than a distribution of earnings in excess of costs.
(2) Any change in an organization's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in the organization's level of compensation, particularly when it was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities of the organization or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.
e. Unallowable costs. Costs which are unallowable under other paragraphs of this Attachment shall not be allowable under this paragraph solely on the basis that they constitute personal compensation.
f. Fringe benefits.
(1) Fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as vacation leave, sick leave, military leave, and the like, are allowable, provided such costs are absorbed by all organization activities in proportion to the relative amount of time or effort actually devoted to each.
(2) Fringe benefits in the form of employer contributions or expenses for social security, employee insurance, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plan costs (see subparagraph h), and the like, are allowable, provided such benefits are granted in accordance with established written organization policies. Such benefits whether treated as indirect costs or as direct costs, shall be distributed to particular awards and other activities in a manner consistent with the pattern of benefits accruing to the individuals or group of employees whose salaries and wages are chargeable to such awards and other activities.
(3) (a) Provisions for a reserve under a self-insurance program for unemployment compensation or workers' compensation are allowable to the extent that the provisions represent reasonable estimates of the liabilities for such compensation, and the types of coverage, extent of coverage, and rates and premiums would have been allowable had insurance been purchased to cover the risks. However, provisions for self-insured liabilities which do not become payable for more than one year after the provision is made shall not exceed the present value of the liability.
(b) Where an organization follows a consistent policy of expensing actual payments to, or on behalf of, employees or former employees for unemployment compensation or workers' compensation, such payments are allowable in the year of payment with the prior approval of the awarding agency, provided they are allocated to all activities of the organization.
(4) Costs of insurance on the lives of trustees, officers, or other employees holding positions of
similar responsibility are allowable only to the extent that the insurance represents additional
compensation. The costs of such insurance when the organization is named as beneficiary are
unallowable.
g. Organization-furnished automobiles. That portion of the cost of organization-furnished
automobiles that relates to personal use by employees (including transportation to and from work)
is unallowable as fringe benefit or indirect costs regardless of whether the cost is reported as
taxable income to the employees. These costs are allowable as direct costs to sponsored award
when necessary for the performance of the sponsored award and approved by awarding agencies.
h. Pension plan costs.
(1) Costs of the organization's pension plan which are incurred in accordance with the established policies of the organization are allowable, provided:
(a) Such policies meet the test of reasonableness;
(b) The methods of cost allocation are not discriminatory;
(c) The cost assigned to each fiscal year is determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), as prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 8
issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants; and
(d) The costs assigned to a given fiscal year are funded for all plan participants within six months after the end of that year. However, increases to normal and past service pension costs caused by a delay in funding the actuarial liability beyond 30 days after each quarter of the year to which such costs are assignable are unallowable.
(2) Pension plan termination insurance premiums paid pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-406) are allowable. Late payment charges on such premiums are unallowable.
(3) Excise taxes on accumulated funding deficiencies and other penalties imposed under ERISA are unallowable.
i. Incentive compensation. Incentive compensation to employees based on cost reduction, or efficient performance, suggestion awards, safety awards, etc., are allowable to the extent that the overall compensation is determined to be reasonable and such costs are paid or accrued pursuant to an agreement entered into in good faith between the organization and the employees before the services were rendered, or pursuant to an established plan followed by the organization so consistently as to imply, in effect, an agreement to make such payment.
j. Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums. See paragraph 32.
k. Severance pay. See paragraph 49.
l. Training and education costs. See paragraph 53.
m. Support of salaries and wages.
(1) Charges to awards for salaries and wages